The elections taking place in Israel today are not merely a contest for power. They represent a critical test for the country’s future, its democratic cohesion and its place in the Middle East. The fundamental question is not simply whether Benjamin Netanyahu will remain prime minister, but whether the policies he has pursued in recent years can continue.
Netanyahu’s strategy has rested on military superiority, deterrence and the belief that Israel’s security can be ensured primarily through the exercise of power. However, prolonged conflicts, the humanitarian tragedy in Gaza, international isolation and domestic polarisation have exposed the limitations of this approach.
Military strength is essential to Israel’s security. It cannot, however, replace politics, diplomacy and the pursuit of lasting peace.
The election results may not provide a clear resolution. The fragmentation of the political system, divisions between parties and the difficulty of forming a stable majority all create the risk of renewed political uncertainty.
At the same time, the growing influence of the ultra-Orthodox community highlights deeper social divisions. Issues such as military service, education and the relationship between religion and state are testing the cohesion of Israeli society and call for political consensus rather than further division.
The next government, regardless of its composition, will face historic decisions. It will need to restore confidence in democratic institutions, curb the influence of extremist forces and return diplomacy to the centre of foreign policy.
Above all, however, it must reconsider its policy towards the Palestinians. Without a credible political vision for resolving the Palestinian issue, no military success can be translated into lasting security. The pursuit of a just and sustainable solution, guaranteeing security for Israel and self-determination for the Palestinians, must return to the political agenda.
Restoring relations with European partners, maintaining the strategic relationship with the United States and strengthening ties with moderate Arab countries could create the conditions for a new regional security architecture.
Israel possesses strong institutions, considerable economic and technological capabilities, and a society with deep-rooted democratic traditions.
The day after requires political foresight and a sense of historical responsibility. The real issue at stake is not merely Netanyahu’s political survival, but the need to move beyond his political approach.
For Israel’s future cannot be built on perpetual conflict, but on security, democracy and peace.